Hard Questions_ Is Spending Time on Social Media Bad for Us

Information technology has get nearly impossible to escape news related to the COVID-19 crisis, even with the increasing social distancing efforts. Coronavirus news leads evening newscasts, and almost every politician and even tardily-nighttime comedians are discussing the virus. Social media platforms are also filled with coronavirus related stories, and a lot of people are turning to social networks to consume coronavirus news. But the question is whether a person should plow to these digital platforms for their daily dose of news or non?

Social media platforms continue to remain filled with coronavirus faux news despite the best efforts to stop the spread of misinformation across these platforms. It is evident that everything you see on social media is not valid, notwithstanding more and more users are turning to these platforms for coronavirus updates.

Flixed, in its latest study, revealed that nigh ane-in-six Americans currently use YouTube as their principal coronavirus news source. At the same time, Facebook continues to be the number i, followed by Twitter. A creative strategist on Flixed's project, Matt Gillespie, states that co-ordinate to their research, people are spending an additional 15 minutes a day on consuming news during the coronavirus crunch.

According to Charles King of Pund-It, a tech industry analyst, YouTube situations practise not surprise him and that a lot of bad actors or organizations or even states have been using the cyberspace to spread misinformation.

YouTube is expanding its fact-checking efforts to stop the spread of misinformation. King also explained that social media companies, including Google-owned YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, are increasingly being required to take steps to terminate the spread of false information across their corresponding platforms.

In these times of 'too much data,' increased time spent on consuming coronavirus related news is taking a mental health toll on people. Flixed study shows that increased consumption of news during the pandemic is worsening the mental health of users.

According to Flixed research, 57.6% of users who spent increased time on Reddit experienced overall worsened mental health, while only 22.6% said that reading more nigh the coronavirus improved their mental health. Flixed constitute that limiting the amount of screen time, especially COVID-nineteen related content on social media platforms, can consequence in enhanced mental health conditions as 43% of people who defined the consumption of coronavirus news reported improved mental wellness conditions.


  • Too read: Privacy for a Premium: Exploring People's Sentiments on Paying for Social Media (infographic)

But one of the problems people face is that there is a desire to apply social media during the lockdowns as most people are in isolation. Gillespie said that people who consume a limited amount of news related to the coronavirus reported improved mental health as compared to those who set no limits. Pund-IT'due south Male monarch stated that turning off the screen requires a particular corporeality of willpower, and if unplugging results in a improve mental wellness country, cut the cord.

Read side by side: Report Shows The Comparing Of The Usage Of News Sources And The Extent To Which Consumers Trust Them

0 Response to "Hard Questions_ Is Spending Time on Social Media Bad for Us"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel